The Weekly Bottom Line

Our summary of recent economic events and what to expect in the weeks ahead

Date Published: April 16, 2021


Print Version

Share this:

U.S. Highlights

  • Headline inflation jumped in March, but it’s too soon to sound the alarm. Economic slack is still high, inflation expectations benign, and the Fed unlikely to sit on the sidelines if they drift up persistently.
  • Retail sales surged in March, thanks to massive income supports, accelerated vaccine rollouts and loosening restrictions

Canadian Highlights

  • The upcoming week is a big one for Canada. The federal government is releasing a budget for the first time in two years, and the Bank of Canada is following that up with its April Monetary Policy Report two days later.
  • Much is expected in the federal budget. Childcare is likely to be an important feature, while climate change, and infrastructure initiatives will also get a nod. 

Financial Highlights

  • The issue of corporate taxation is back in the spotlight. President Biden has proposed an increase to the US corporate tax rate and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has recommended a global minimum rate of corporate tax.
  • These proposals appear to be initiating a sea change. For decades, there has been a race to the bottom, where governments consistently reduced corporate taxes in an effort to attract investment. The race appears to be over. 

 U.S. -  Much to Cheer About

Jump to: Next Section

The chart shows the year on year percentage change in consumer prices. Both headline and core (ex. Energy and food) prices are reported. After tanking in the first half of last year, headline inflation has made a strong come back. But the increase in headline inflation is mostly due to energy prices. Core inflation remains subdued.

Who said the stock market rally was over? After a slow start to the week, the S&P 500 hit another all time high. As of writing, the index is up 1.3% compared to last week’s close. Equities were helped by strong earnings and better than expected economic data. But interestingly, bond yields dropped on the news. At the time of writing, the 10-year Treasury yield was down nine basis points compared to last week. Usually, bond yields rise in response to strong data. The fact that yields drifted lower might seem like an anomaly but is likely due to the market already having priced in the economic recovery and inflation expectations. Meanwhile, growth stocks behaved as expected. Lower yields tend to increase future earnings of growth-oriented companies. So, tech stock rebounded as yields dropped.

On to one of economists’ favorite topic these days, inflation! Consumer prices jumped in March (Chart 1). Inflation rose 0.6% month-on-month (m/m), pushing headline inflation to 2.6% year-on-year (y/y). Meanwhile, core inflation (ex. food and energy) was up 0.3% compared to the previous month and 1.6% higher compared to a year ago. The rise in inflation was mostly due to energy prices which went up 5.0% on the month. Energy prices will continue to keep the headline inflation number elevated over the next few months. In fact, year-on-year inflation numbers are likely to push through the 3% mark given the drop in prices in the second quarter of 2020.

The chart reports retail sales in US$ billions. After plummeting in April 2020, retail sales have made a strong comeback. Income supports, accelerated vaccine rollouts and loosening restrictions helped retail sales end the first quarter on a high. Retail sales are currently 17.1% higher than February 2020, just before the pandemic-induced restrictions took hold.

Still, its too soon to sound the inflation alarm. The unemployment rate is still 2.5 percentage points (ppts) higher than its pre-recession level and there are roughly eight million fewer jobs. The 5-year U.S. breakeven – a measure of inflation expectations based on the spread between nominal and inflation adjusted Treasury yields – has cooled since hitting its highest point since 2008 in March. Rest assured the Federal Reserve is watching this and other measures of inflation expectations closely. In fact, Fed Vice Chair Richard Clarida said that if inflation expectations were to “drift up persistently […] that would indicate to me that policy would need to be adjusted.” Clarida also added that the Fed’s “metrics of success” on inflation is keeping inflation expectations anchored at 2%. According to the Vice Chair, inflation expectations most recently stood at 1.96%.

Meanwhile, income supports, accelerated vaccine rollouts and loosening restrictions helped retail sales end the first quarter on a high note (Chart 2). Retail sales surged by 9.8% month-on-month in March, almost four ppts more than market expectations. The level of retail sales was a whopping 17.1% higher than February 2020, just before pandemic-induced restrictions took hold. Going forward, spending is likely remain robust as the job market strengthens and Americans tap into accumulated savings.

Sohaib Shahid, Senior Economist | 416-982-2556

Canada - Federal Budget Headlines The Week Ahead

Jump to: Previous Section | Next Section | Top

Chart 1 reports federal debt as a share of GDP from 2015 to 2025. The year 2020 to 2025 are projections provided by the government in the Fall Economic Statement (FES) Last year. The baseline projection saw the debt burden rise to around 50% in 2020 before gradually declining through to 2025. The FES also provided projections for $70 and $100 billion in additional stimulus which would send the debt burden higher through to 2023 before slowly declining in 2024 and 2025

The upcoming week is shaping up to be big one for Canada. The federal government is unveiling its budget for the first time in two years on Monday April 19th. The Bank of Canada will follow that up with a policy announcement and its Monetary Policy Report two days later. 

There is a lot of hype around the federal budget. Aside from the two-year delay, this fiscal plan promises to be one that pushes forward long-standing goals of the Liberal government. Topping the list of priorities is childcare. At the party convention last week, Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland told attendees that now was the time to "get this done". It's unclear how exactly policymakers will accomplish this mission, but it's certain that funding for childcare will feature prominently in next week's budget. 

There are also expectations that the government will announce more spending on climate change, pharmacare, housing, and infrastructure. We will also get details on how the government plans to spend the $70 to $100 billion in funds that were left unallocated in last year's Fall Economic Statement (FES). Given the economy's better-than-expected showing thus far, there may be less need to funnel this money towards the near-term recovery. Still, given the extraordinary nature of the third wave of the pandemic, a share of spending is likely destined to provide immediate support for Canadians and businesses most impacted by the health crisis.

How will the government pay for all of these programs? The answer appears to be by taking on more debt. There are some indications that tax increases are on the way, particularly on digital companies. Even still, revenue increases are unlikely to cover all the new spending. With bigger deficits  the debt to GDP ratio will continue to head higher. In the FES last November, the government saw the ratio rising by 20 percentage points to a little over 50% in 2020. Additional spending will send the ratio higher over the coming years. We will be looking for details on how and when the government plans to put it on a downward trajectory.

Chart 2 shows quarter-over-quarter GDP growth in 2020Q4 and 2021Q1 as projected by the Bank of Canada in the January Monetary Policy Report and actual data. For 2021Q1, the actual is represented by what growth would be given already released monthly GDP for January and the flash estimate for February. In both bases, actual growth is considerably higher than what the Bank of Canada had projected in the MPR.

The Bank of Canada (BoC) will be watching the budget closely as it prepares the April Monetary Policy Report (MPR). The Bank had assumed the government will spend $70 billion of the unallocated funds in the January MPR. This will need to be revised if the budget incorporates something different. In fact, the Bank's previous forecasts will require a hefty upward revision given the resilience shown by the Canadian economy.  In January, the Bank expected GDP growth in the fourth quarter of 2020 to be 4.8% q/q annualized, but actual growth came in double that at 9.6% (Chart 2). Likewise, the Bank expected GDP to contract in the first quarter of 2021, but monthly data suggest the economy will see a strong expansion to start the year.

Given the stronger recovery, the Bank will likely begin tapering the asset-purchase program next week. However, it may wait to see the impacts of the third wave before making a call on the overnight rate, which it had previously said will remain at the effective lower bound until sometime in 2023.

Sri Thanabalasingam, Senior Economist | 416-413-3117 

Financial - U.S. Corporate Taxes, Under the Microscope

Jump to: Previous Section | Next Section | Top

The chart shows the corporate tax rate for the Americas, the Globe, the OECD, and Europe over time. All economic areas show a decline from 2004 to 2021. The high for 2021 is 27.2% (Americas) and the low is 20.7% (Europe).

Corporate taxation has been the topic du jour for policy makers in recent weeks. In addition to President Biden's push to raise the U.S. corporate tax rate to 28%, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen recently proposed a global minimum tax for larger multinational corporations, in order to "level the playing field" and avoid tax leakage. 

This push comes after years of governments around the world actively reducing tax rates in order to attract corporate investment. Since 2004, the average global corporate tax rate has declined from 29%, to 23.7% in 2021 (Chart 1). For the U.S., it was only four years ago that the Trump administration passed one of the largest corporate tax cuts in modern history. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, with the intent of triggering a corporate investment boom. Corporate investment has disappointed, but the policy did result in a greater percentage of profits being retained by large corporations. To be exact, corporate earnings after tax and interest payments rose from 67% of total operating earnings at the end of 2017, to 75% by the end of 2018. Corporations retained a larger share of the pie, while investors in these companies saw a valuation adjustment and strong price appreciation.

The international story is also telling. U.S. companies have spent years setting up and investing in holding companies (non-bank) domiciled in lower taxed countries. Indeed, roughly half of U.S. foreign investment has been in holding companies, with the majority of this investment in Europe. The TCJA eased this trend by lowing the corporate tax rate to more competitive international levels. Conversely, the Biden administration is proposing a different approach by proposing to raise the tax on overseas profits from 10% to 21%. The new strategy will calculate the minimum tax on a country-by-country basis, which should help address the tax avoidance issue.

Policy analysts know that U.S. corporate taxes are both controversial and convoluted. From an economic perspective, it is imperative the Biden administration strikes the right balance to ensure that corporate incentives to invest remain in place. Assuming the administration is successful in unwinding a large portion of the Trump administration's corporate tax cut, it must also make sure it does not erode U.S. competitiveness. Hence the focus on rewriting the rules globally. Thus far, we have seen supportive voices from Europe, stating that an agreement on corporate taxation could bring about stability. While there is a big difference between voicing support for ending tax avoidance and actually signing onto a U.S.-led agreement, this is a step in the right direction.

James Orlando, CFA, Senior Economist | 416-413-3180