U.S. FOMC Meeting Minutes (July 29, 2026)

FOMC minutes show Fed trying to communicate less without saying less 

• The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) held the federal funds rate at a target range of 3.50% to 3.75% at its July meeting, with three dissents in favor of a 25-basis-point rate increase. 
• The minutes reinforce that the Fed’s communication strategy has shifted under Chair Warsh. The Committee appears intent on reducing explicit forward guidance and putting more weight on realized data, while still emphasizing that inflation remains above target and price stability remains non-negotiable. 
• On inflation, participants continued to see upside risks as material. Supply shocks, including energy-related pressures tied to the Middle East conflict, were seen as a risk to the return to 2%, leaving officials unwilling to treat the inflation shock as temporary or fully contained. 
• The minutes show the meeting should not be received as a one-sided case for imminent tightening. Participants still saw growth as solid and the labor market as broadly balanced but also acknowledged elevated uncertainty and downside risks to activity, giving the majority reason to wait for more confirmation before moving rates higher. 
• Three members, Beth Hammack, Neel Kashkari, and Lorie Logan, dissented from the majority, preferring a 25-basis-point hike because they judged that still-elevated inflation and upside risks to the inflation outlook warranted an immediate increase. 

Key Implications

• The main takeaway is communication: the Fed is trying to reduce explicit forward guidance, but doing so raises the burden on officials to explain their reaction function and assessment of the economy clearly as the inflation-growth tradeoff evolves.  
• The minutes should also be read with an important timing caveat. The July meeting took place before the July CPI and retail sales reports, which materially reduced the near-term case for additional tightening. These minutes are best read less as a live signal of imminent hikes and more as evidence that the Fed was struggling with a real inflation-growth tradeoff before the latest data softened the tightening argument. 

Disclaimer

This report is provided by TD Economics. It is for informational and educational purposes only as of the date of writing, and may not be appropriate for other purposes. The views and opinions expressed may change at any time based on market or other conditions and may not come to pass. This material is not intended to be relied upon as investment advice or recommendations, does not constitute a solicitation to buy or sell securities and should not be considered specific legal, investment or tax advice. The report does not provide material information about the business and affairs of TD Bank Group and the members of TD Economics are not spokespersons for TD Bank Group with respect to its business and affairs. The information contained in this report has been drawn from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed to be accurate or complete. This report contains economic analysis and views, including about future economic and financial markets performance. These are based on certain assumptions and other factors, and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. The actual outcome may be materially different. The Toronto-Dominion Bank and its affiliates and related entities that comprise the TD Bank Group are not liable for any errors or omissions in the information, analysis or views contained in this report, or for any loss or damage suffered.