Canada's Economy: Two Quarters Down, But Not Out

• Canadian GDP has now contracted for two consecutive quarters, and the “R-word” is making the rounds again. 
• A primer we wrote a few years ago remains a useful reminder that defining a recession in Canada isn’t as straightforward as the popular “two consecutive quarters of negative GDP” rule of thumb. 
• In Canada, recession is determined by the C.D. Howe Institute's Business Cycle Council (BCC), which evaluates economic downturns through three lenses: duration, amplitude, and scope. Its definition of a recession is “a pronounced, persistent, and pervasive decline in aggregate economic activity.” That means even a single quarter of GDP contraction could ultimately be judged a recession if weakness is pronounced and becomes broad-based. Conversely, two quarters of contraction do not automatically qualify. 
• The last time the Council weighed in on the issue, in September 2025, it concluded that the economy had not met the threshold for a recession despite a quarterly decline in GDP. Today, the Canadian economy is clearly operating below capacity, which is not surprising given the uncertainty surrounding CUSMA negotiations and broader trade tensions. But the details matter. Aside from a surge in imports, the weakness in the first-quarter GDP was driven by pullback in in government spending and a decline in investment in structures. On the industry side, the softness is most evident in trade-exposed industries. 
• At the same time, several factors point in the opposite direction. Given Canada's population decline, GDP per capita is growing, consumer spending, while soft, is still expanding, and investment in machinery and equipment and intellectual property products increased at a healthy clip. Government spending is also likely to recover, as policymakers increasingly focus on supporting domestic growth and investing in defence and infrastructure.  
• Indeed, Bank of Canada Deputy Governor Rogers struck a similar note during her appearance in Parliament on Monday, suggesting that applying the recession label in the current cycle is more challenging than in the past. Structural factors are increasingly constraining Canada's potential growth in both GDP and employment, blurring the line between expansion and recession.
• Taken together, the picture is more nuanced than the headline GDP figures would suggest. The unweighted diffusion index of GDP by industry has yet to breach the recessionary threshold, while the flash industry GDP estimate points growth in April. Given two quarters contraction in GDP the BCC is likely to be meeting soon to make a more official assessment. But in the meantime, the term "technical recession' remains a media-friendly rule of thumb, rather than an accurate description of the broader economy. 

Disclaimer

This report is provided by TD Economics. It is for informational and educational purposes only as of the date of writing, and may not be appropriate for other purposes. The views and opinions expressed may change at any time based on market or other conditions and may not come to pass. This material is not intended to be relied upon as investment advice or recommendations, does not constitute a solicitation to buy or sell securities and should not be considered specific legal, investment or tax advice. The report does not provide material information about the business and affairs of TD Bank Group and the members of TD Economics are not spokespersons for TD Bank Group with respect to its business and affairs. The information contained in this report has been drawn from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed to be accurate or complete. This report contains economic analysis and views, including about future economic and financial markets performance. These are based on certain assumptions and other factors, and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. The actual outcome may be materially different. The Toronto-Dominion Bank and its affiliates and related entities that comprise the TD Bank Group are not liable for any errors or omissions in the information, analysis or views contained in this report, or for any loss or damage suffered.