Skip to main content

The Curious Case of Young Families’ Shrinking Mortgages

Maria Solovieva, CFA, Economist | 416-380-1195

Date Published: July 29, 2025

Download

Share:

Highlights

  • Statistics Canada’s Distributions of Household Economic Accounts (DHEA) contains a treasure chest of interesting facts and figures on the financial position of households. One trend that stood out for several quarters now is the steady decline in average mortgage balances of young families, even as mortgage debt has continued to rise for all other age groups (Chart 1).
  • Since the peak in Q3 2022, average mortgage balances among households where the primary earner is under 35 years of age have fallen by $15.5k. Compared to Q1 2023, the reduction stands at $11k. Over the same period, mortgage balances increased by $18k for households aged 55-64 and by $4k for those aged 65 and older. 
  • The drop among younger borrowers appears to be at least partly explained by a decline in young people entering the housing market or opting for less expensive homes due to affordability challenges. Household formation in this age group has surged, growing at 2.5 times faster than other age groups in the last two years – yet many of these new households remain renters. According to Statistics Canada’ 2024 Canadian Social Survey more than half of young people reporting being very concerned about their ability to afford housing1. Home ownership remains elusive for younger generations with 35% of young adults renting, compared to 23% of older aged group. 
  • Chart 1 is a line chart showing indexed average mortgage debt by age group from Q4 2019 to Q1 2025 (Q4 2019 = 100). While mortgage balances steadily increased for all age groups, households under 35 saw their balances peak at 121.6 in Q3 2022 before declining to 106.5 by Q1 2025. In contrast, mortgage balances for those aged 55-64 years and 65 + continued rising, reaching 162.7 and 150.5, respectively. Chart 2 is an indexed line chart comparing total real estate assets and total mortgage debt for households under 35 from Q3 2022 to Q1 2025 (Q3 2022 = 100). Real estate assets rose to 111 while mortgage debt fell to 98, showing a divergence between asset values and liabilities.
  • Another possible explanation is downsizing: young homeowners may be trading high-priced homes for more affordable ones in response to higher borrowing costs. But the data doesn’t support this idea. Since Q3 2022, the total value of real estate assets has actually increased, while the total value of mortgages has declined (Chart 2). If downsizing were widespread, we’d expect asset values to fall in tandem with mortgage balances. 
    • Instead, this gap may be explained by another phenomenon: the growing share of younger households owning their homes outright. According to the Survey of Financial Security (SFS), last conducted in 2023 – at the start of our analysis – 8% of households owned their property free and clear.  That is the highest share on record (Chart 3). This trend may have persisted in subsequent quarters. 
  • Chart 3 shows a percentage of households under 35 who own their principal residence and those who have a mortgage on it across the six years: 1999, 2005, 2012, 2016, 2019 and 2023. In 2023, 44% owned a principal residence and 36% held a mortgage on it, creating the largest recorded gap of 8 percentage points, which implies that more households own their homes outright. Chart 4 is a bar chart that compares the percent change in average wages and financial assets since Q1 2023 by age groups. All age groups experienced growth, but households under 35 saw the smallest increases: wages up 6.3% and financial assets up 9.1%, compared to higher gains in older cohorts.
  • Finally, another explanation for why average mortgage balances falling is prepayment. It’s very likely that some of the youngest households may be prioritizing reducing debt obligations in the face of the rise in the cost of borrowing since 2022. This raises another question: how are younger homeowners managing to fund prepayments. Employee compensation and financial asset growth for young families has been modest compared to other age groups (Chart 4). This points to another potential source: financial support from older relatives.
  • Indeed, as younger families reduced debt, older age groups – especially those nearing or in the retirement – took on more. Yet there is no sign of increased ownership of investment properties or spike in renovation activity that would typically justify an increased leverage among these groups. That raises the possibility that some of this debt is being used to help adult children with homeownership. 
  • Chart 5 is a bar chart that compares the Debt-to-Income (DTI) ratio of households under 35 by income quintile in 2018-19 and Q1 2025. All quintiles except the lowest saw declining DTI. The lowest income quintile's DTI rose sharply from 244% to 446%, signaling increasing financial strain.
  • Other research on intergenerational support backs up this view. A 2021 study by Statistics Canada found that 17.3% of residential properties owned by individuals born in the 1990s were co-owned with their parents2. Similarly, a recent Bank of Canada study highlights the growing role of parental support: over 20% of first-time homebuyers (FTHBs) received gifted down payments, with younger FTHBs more likely to receive this assistance than their older peers3. These gifts – whether drawn from financial assets or sourced through borrowing – lower children’s loan-to-value ratios, helping them qualify for mortgages and purchase homes that would otherwise be out of reach. If what we see in the DHEA is capturing the effects of parents borrowing to support their children, it suggests that intergenerational wealth transfer increasingly occurs not just through asset gifts, but also through the debt channel.
  • This pattern isn’t spread evenly across income levels. Among the lowest-income young households, the debt-to-income (DTI) ratio – a key measure of financial vulnerability – has surged from 244% before the pandemic to 446% in Q1 2025, signaling rising financial strain. In contrast, this ratio improved across all other income cohorts during the same period (Chart 5). This reinforces concerns that housing-centric wealth transfer could deepen intergeneration inequality, as homeownership becomes increasingly dependent on family support, leaving lower-income young families further behind.

End Notes

  1. Statistics Canada. Housing challenges related to affordability, adequacy, condition and discrimination, August 2 to September 15, 2024. Available at; https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/241119/dq241119b-eng.htm
  2. Khalid, A., Gordon, J., and Mirdamadi, M, Intergenerational housing outcomes in Canada: Parents’ housing wealth, adult children’s property values and parent–child co-ownership. May 2024. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/46-28-0001/2024001/article/00002-eng.htm
  3. Allen, J., Carmichael, K., Clark, R., Li, S, and Vincent, N., Housing Affordability and Parental Income Support. July 2024. Available at: https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/swp2024-28.pdf
     

Disclaimer