Alberta Votes “No” to Separation, Now What?

Highlights

• On Monday, Albertans voted in favour of Canada. The counting and checks are ongoing but as of 9am (EST), 75.9% supported to "remain a province of Canada", with the other votes cast in support of the proposal to begin the process toward a future binding referendum on separation. Over 1.75 million Albertans expressed their opinions.
• The outcome was consistent with polling, which showed support for separation was in the 20%-35% range.
• Separation, Question 10, dominated a ballot that contained nine other referendum questions, including five related to immigration and four focused on government and constitutional issues. The final polling results on these will be known by Wednesday. 
• Question 10 was not a vote on separation itself, but on whether Alberta should pursue a future binding referendum. Even if the measure had passed, there would still be significant legal, constitutional, and political hurdles to overcome.
   

Key Implications

• The emotionally charged “Question 10” has been answered but does not end the conversation. 
• The result removes an important source of immediate uncertainty for Alberta's economy but does not, on its own, address all the underlying frustrations that gave rise to the referendum debate given that a non-trivial amount of the population (over 400,000) voted towards separation.
• There will undoubtedly be further demands placed on Alberta's politicians for federal policy 'concessions', particularly once the results of the other nine questions are finalized. These are currently tracking "yes" responses across the board, but the counting remains too incomplete for conclusive results.
• At the same time, businesses and investors will be looking for evidence of enduring certainty. This should be the case for the next five years. The referendum emerged from Alberta's citizen initiative framework, which allows constitutional questions to advance through a petition process requiring support equivalent to 10% of the votes cast in the previous provincial election. 
• The legislation prevents the issue from immediately returning to the ballot by prohibiting substantially similar proposals for five years following an unsuccessful vote.
• That period creates an opportunity to address underlying concerns within the provincial population. It also affords time to rebuild broader investor confidence that a predictable backdrop is here to stay. From an economic lens, this is particularly important when courting investment in large capital projects where the timeframe from proposal to operation spans multiple government election cycles.
• Prior to the referendum, various groups attempted to estimate this risk. For example, research commissioned by the Calgary Chamber of Commerce estimated that a Brexit-style decline in investment could result in $10-15 billion in foregone investment. The same study suggested that a sustained increase in trade costs could leave Alberta's economy $41-62 billion smaller annually and reduce the workforce by 115,000-175,000 workers. Separately, research from the University of Calgary estimated that even under a relatively smooth separation scenario, Alberta's GDP would be roughly 2.2% lower over its first five years.
• With the results of the vote, some delayed investment decisions may now move forward. An Alberta Chamber of Commerce survey found that 44% of businesses reported the separation debate was affecting their operations, while many indicated investments or projects had been delayed, scaled back, or cancelled.
  
  
• Discussions need to shift back to issues that will ultimately have a greater influence on the province's long-run performance, including major investments (notably the Pacific Link pipeline), trade diversification, and developing a labour market with the needed skills.
  
   

Bottom Line

• A non-trivial share of Albertans supported separation and their concerns may linger. With a relatively low voter threshold that enables the question to come back on the ballot, investors will be looking for signs on whether Alberta risks a perpetual five-year cycle of constitutional uncertainty. The extent to which this vote provides finality is what matters most for large-scale investment, confidence, and long-term growth.

Disclaimer

This report is provided by TD Economics. It is for informational and educational purposes only as of the date of writing, and may not be appropriate for other purposes. The views and opinions expressed may change at any time based on market or other conditions and may not come to pass. This material is not intended to be relied upon as investment advice or recommendations, does not constitute a solicitation to buy or sell securities and should not be considered specific legal, investment or tax advice. The report does not provide material information about the business and affairs of TD Bank Group and the members of TD Economics are not spokespersons for TD Bank Group with respect to its business and affairs. The information contained in this report has been drawn from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed to be accurate or complete. This report contains economic analysis and views, including about future economic and financial markets performance. These are based on certain assumptions and other factors, and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. The actual outcome may be materially different. The Toronto-Dominion Bank and its affiliates and related entities that comprise the TD Bank Group are not liable for any errors or omissions in the information, analysis or views contained in this report, or for any loss or damage suffered.