Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence Technologies Can Help Address Canada’s Productivity Slump

Rannella Billy-Ochieng’, Senior Economist | 416-350-0017
Anusha Arif, Economic Analyst
Daniella Garcia, Corporate Communications and Design Specialist

Date Published: May 28, 2024

Download

Share:

Highlights

  • Canada has a productivity problem and artificial intelligence (AI) driven innovations may offer a remedy.
  • The latest advancement in this general-purpose technology is manifesting with great speed and some experts
    believe that AI will be the leading technology of the next Industrial Revolution.
  • Canada’s unique AI ecosystem provides a good starting position for us ride this industrial growth wave, but poor
    adoption policies and weak AI preparedness may derail this opportunity.
  • In the more optimistic scenario, the adoption of AI across industries could lead to an output increase of 5%-8%
    over the baseline over the next decade.
Chart 1 illustrates annual average productivity growth of Canada's business sector in six stacked bar charts for decade-long periods starting from the period 1965 to 1974 and running through to 2015 to 2022 (the most recent year available). The contribution to labour productivity from capital intensity (capital per worker) and labour composition is shown in black. The contribution from total factor productivity (TFP) – the change in economic output not attributable to increases in inputs – is shown in light green. In the decade running from 1965 to 1974, labour productivity averaged 3.0%, with TFP contributing just under one percentage point and capital intensity/labour composition contributing just over two percentage points. From 1975 to 1984 labour productivity growth slowed to just under 2.5% with TFP adding just over 0.5 percentage points and capital intensity the remainder. From 1985 through 1994, labour productivity growth slowed to just 1% annually. Increases in TFP subtracted slightly from labour productivity over this period and capital intensity/labour composition added just over one percentage point. From 1995 through 2004, labour productivity accelerated to just under 2%, with TFP adding just over 0.5 percentage points and capital intensity/labour composition the remainder. From 2005 through 2014, labour productivity slowed to 1% annual average growth, with all gains attributable to capital intensity/labour composition and TFP subtracting slightly over 0.2 percentage points. Finally from 2015 through 2022, labour productivity slowed further to just 0.8%. With TFP growth flat, all gains were due to increases in capital intensity/labour composition.

Canada has a longstanding productivity problem. Simply put, Canada’s economy has struggled to find ways to boost the productivity of workers. While weak investment explains some of Canada’s productivity underperformance, much of the malaise in recent decades has been due to a slowing rate of technological change. Total factor productivity, which captures the change in economic output not attributable to increased inputs, has been slowing since the 1960s. For the past two decades, total factor productivity has, on average, subtracted from labour productivity (Chart 1). When an economy struggles with weak productivity, living standards often erode. At the same time, having a smaller productive bandwidth makes it harder to fight inflation, since it shrinks the potential at which a country can grow without stoking inflationary embers. 

Technology that boosts innovation and the rate of technological change could inject life back into Canada’s growth trajectory. Advancement in generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies is currently taking place at a rapid speed and may spur faster productivity gains. As a general-purpose technology, generative AI has a broad reach because the innovation offered by AI interfaces with existing and widely available technological infrastructure such as computers, tablets, and handheld devices. These technologies have the potential to boost productivity, particularly of cognitive workers who can apply it to their everyday jobs. Canada is well placed to embrace this next wave of digital transformation. Canada’s AI ecosystem stands out as a premium product and is home to a high concentration of generative companies and world-ranking talent. While the talent pipeline is promising, Canadian businesses have poor AI adoption rates relative to their U.S. peers. The absence of widespread adoption and commercialization of AI among business could stand in the way of Canada fully capitalizing on this nascent opportunity.

 Generative AI could break that mold, with signs that it is being introduced to consumers at a record speed. While it took Netflix 3.5 years and Instagram 2.5 months to reach 1 million users, Chat GPT shattered records by achieving this milestone in a mere 5 days.

Cognitive Machines: Making People Work Smarter

We may well be on the brink of a technological revolution that will alter the way we work. Like past waves of growth-inducing technological change, AI is not specific to any one industry, but is rather a general purpose technology that can be utilized broadly across the economy. What makes it different is how quickly it could be implemented.  Past waves of innovation, such as the mechanization of manufacturing during the Industrial Revolution, or the introduction of computers in the 20th century, took decades to play out (see Text Box below). Generative AI could break that mold, with signs that it is being introduced to consumers at a record speed. While it took Netflix 3.5 years and Instagram 2.5 months to reach 1 million users, Chat GPT shattered records by achieving this milestone in a mere 5 days (see Graphic above). The implications are profound and immediate. Research from the OECD suggests that given the recent ease of use in language and image-generating models, the speed of diffusion may be faster than previous technological waves.However this possibility hinges on complementary investments in things that improve AI preparedness (e.g. data, training, digital infrastructure & capabilities).2  

Generative AI stands out from earlier automation waves in other important way. While past waves of innovation were helpful at automating routine and repeatable tasks, generative AI stands out for its ability to solve complex problems and mimic human cognitive abilities. All industries are likely to benefit from AI; however, the impact will likely to be most transformational in sectors that rely on knowledge work, such as technology, financial services, banking, pharmaceuticals, medical products, and education.

Four Waves of Industrial Revolution

  • The Industrial Revolution started in the late 18th century with the use of steam power, which allowed for massive generation of useful energy. 
  • By the arrival of the second Industrial Revolution in the 19th century, electric power helped to create mass production and mechanized manufacturing. 
  • The third Industrial Revolution used electronics and information technology to automate production in the 20th century. 
  • We are arguably now in the fourth Industrial Revolution that builds on the digital revolution and can be characterized as a fusion of technology, which blurs the lines between physical, digital, and biological spheres. 

(Source: World Economic Forum - The Fourth Industrial Revolution, What it Means and How to Respond, The Second Machine Age, Work Progress and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technology)

Demystifying Fear About Widespread Job losses

Chart 2 shows three bars showing the share of jobs that are expected to be high exposure and high complementary to AI technology in advanced economies, emerging market economies and low income economies respectively. These high exposure and high complementary jobs are the type of roles where workers are expected to use AI tools to augment the way they work. Among all countries, advanced economies have the highest level of high exposure and high complementary jobs of 27%. Roughly 16% of jobs in emerging market have high exposure and high complementary and the figure falls to 8% for jobs in low-income countries. These results were sourced from the International Monetary Fund staff research papers.

Although AI has the potential to bolster growth, critics worry that the rise of cognitive machines will create widespread job losses. However, history has shown that technological advancement tends to be positive for employment in the long run, and past fears about widespread job losses did not materialize.

The natural course of the jobs market is to evolve with the creation of new technology. When it comes to the impact of generative AI on employment, early empirical evidence suggest that AI is more complementary to labour than it is displacing.3  Even as AI displaces some workers, the productivity effect boosts aggregate demand and the increase in demand for workers could dominate the substitution effect.4
While most jobs in advanced economies are exposed to AI, the high concentration of cognitive-based occupations in advance economies, means a huge opportunity for complementary roles (Chart 2). Empirical evidence show that college-educated workers are better prepared to move from at-risk jobs to complementary jobs, thereby bolstering their ability to ride this innovation wave.5 Canada’s high concentration of highly-educated workers suggests that there are reasons for optimism in workers ability to adapt.

From Efficiency to Economic Growth 

Chart 3 is a bar chart showing the share of overall compensation that is paid to high skilled workers over the time period 1997- 2023. High skilled jobs are occupations that require a degree and those in management or specialized roles. The bar graph shows that the share of compensation paid to high skilled workers has been steadily increasing over this time horizon, rising from just over 42% in 1997 to 52% in 2023, with a particularly big jump in 2020, after the onset of the covid pandemic.

Cognitive machines have the potential to help workers perform more efficiently and could even augment the creation of innovative ideas.6 To assess how much generative AI could boost economic growth, we need to appreciate how AI technology interacts with labour.  Activities exposed to AI are the tasks that can be executed with the help of a technology, either augmenting or substituting for labour. 

As a first step we mapped out the cognitive economy using two methods. First, we identified the share of compensation paid to high-skilled jobs that require a degree and those in management or specialized roles (Chart 3). Secondly, we deconstructed occupations through a task-based lens to isolate jobs that are likely to be complemented by AI and have medium risks of automation.7 Taken together we have a range of estimate for the cognitive sector (52%-68%), which captures the share of workers likely to be exposed to generative AI. That range is comparable to the IMF’s estimated share of workers in high-exposure occupations living in advanced economies.8

More productive workers will have broader implications on firm level performance.  Earlier research shows that estimated the effect of AI on firm level productivity ranges from 0%–11%.9 We applied conservative estimates of firm level productivity. More recent studies that look specifically at generative AI, suggest that it has the potential to boost the productivity of tasks by 10%-56%. Since these results were observed in frontier companies, we were cautious not to generalize those estimates. Understanding that the diffusion of technology takes years, we incorporated a phase in period of ten years and assume that roughly half of Canadian companies will embrace the technology by then. 

The potential for AI to boost economic growth starts with the increased efficiency of output and extends to the acceleration of innovation – which helps to spur future productivity growth (see graphic below).10 Based on the share of jobs in AI-complementary occupations, our analysis suggests that with adoption ramping up, Canada’s real GDP could be up to 5%–8% higher in the next ten years than our current baseline.  That implies a 0.5%–0.7% lift to annual-producitivty that will help to offset some of headwinds from an ageing workforce. 

If a larger share of workplace occupations integrates AI or use the technology for more complex tasks, then this would push the productivity impact even higher. Research from the IMF shows AI has the potential to generate up to a 1.5 percentage point increase in workers’ average annual productivity growth rate in the United Kingdom.11  Other studies report a similar average lift of ~1%.12 Benchmarking our results shows consistency with earlier waves of technological innovation, which recorded productivity boosts of 1.3% per year for electricity and 0.8% for ICT.13

The potential for AI to boost economic growth starts with the increased efficiency of output and extends to the acceleration of innovation – which helps to spur future productivity growth.

Canada’s unique AI ecosystem 

Canada’s generative AI ecosystem is globally competitive and is an innovation hub for top AI talent. As a result, Canada ranks second among G7 countries in its concentration of venture capital AI Investments on a per capita basis (Chart 4). Canada is also a top player in the number of Generative AI companies on a per capita basis.14 

While Canada has the AI brain and is home to many startup companies, there are several bottlenecks that stifle growth opportunities. For one, Canada is plagued by weak computing horsepower and has the lowest per capita compute performance among G7 peers. (Chart 5). Most computing infrastructure is in other countries, and this challenges Canadian AI firms.15 Stakeholders also worry that the regulation in the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act AIDA, (introduced as part of Bill C-27), may hinder innovation, and needs some work to hedge against that.16 With new rules coming into effect, some businesses will need time to digest how their workplace policy needs to evolve to appropriately manage privacy laws, employment duties etc. Ultimately this could create a learning curve that will take time to climb.

Chart 4 is a bar chart that shows per capita AI investment in U.S. dollars among G7 countries in 2023. Canada ranks second amongst G7 countries for AI investment per capita. The tallest bar is the United States with investment of $163.7 per person $46.2, United Kingdom with $45.6, France with $30.7, Germany with $25.5, Japan with $11.1 and lastly Italy with $2.2. The data is collected from OECD.AI and some TD Economics calculations. Chart 5 is a bar chart that shows per capita computing performance of G7 countries. The data –collected by the OECD Artificial Intelligence Unit – is a measure of computing power. The higher the number the more powerful the computing ability of the country. The United States has the highest per capita computing performance of 10.6, the highest value among all G7 countries. Japan is second at 7.6., Italy the third at 5.6, France at 2.4, Germany at 1.9, UK at 1.2. Canada has the weakest computing performance of 1. This weak performance put's Canada at the bottom of list at 1.0.

The potential for generative AI to have widespread impacts on the economy is clear but the ability and pace of AI to influence growth will be filtered through the decisions of firms, individuals, and governments. Despite having a strong AI ecosystem, Canadian business lag their peers in their AI adoption. IBM’s global survey of IT professionals shows that Canada has the second lowest adoption rate among G7 countries (22% vs 26.6%).17  Canada’s low adoption rate may be linked to the fact that small businesses are an important fabric of Canada’s economy. AI usage is less prevalent among small firms  and many struggle to scale.

Research from Statistics Canada shows that firms in the information and cultural industries, professional, scientific, and technical services and finance and Insurance have the largest adoption rate. Early movers are embracing this technology and Generative AI is touching different aspects of our life, including wildlife management, fraud detection and enhancing the customer experience.

Research from Statistics Canada shows that firms in the information and cultural industries, professional, scientific, and technical services and finance and Insurance have the highest adoption rate. Early movers are embracing this technology and generative AI is touching different aspects of our life, including wildlife management, fraud detection and enhancing the customer experience (See adoption graphic above). 

Bottom Line

Canada’s struggle with anemic labour productivity is a well-established issue. Developments in Artificial Intelligence can help to answer some of Canada’s productivity woes. Generative AI – a general purpose technology with the ability to mimic cognitive skills – has the potential to be one of the most influential innovations of the fourth Industrial Revolution.18 These technologies will change the way we work, and by helping workers become more efficient, will foster greater economic growth. Canada has a globally competitive AI ecosystem and is well placed to capitalize on this opportunity. However, the extent to which AI technologies can boost growth hinges upon meaningful adaption. To secure our place in global AI ecosystem it is critically important to see more firms embrace the opportunity.  

End Notes

  1. Filippucci et al. (2024) “The impact of Artificial Intelligence on productivity, distribution and growth: Key mechanisms, inital evidence and policy challanges”. OECD Artifical Intelligence Papers
  2. Calvino, F. and L. Fontanelli (2023), “A portrait of AI adopters across countries: Firm characteristics, assets’ complementarities and productivity”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2023/02, OECD Publishing, Paris,https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/a-portrait-of-ai-adopters-across-countries_0fb79bb9-en
  3. Hayton et al. (2023), “What drives UK firms to adopt AI and robotics, and what are the consequences for jobs? “Institute for the Future of Work.
  4. Philippe Aghio (2024) The growth and Employment Effects of AI, Emerging Tech Economic Research Network, San Francisco Federal Reserve. And Cook (2023) Generative AI, Productivity, the Labour Market and Choice Behavior, NBER Economics of AI Conference
  5. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua; UK Labour Force Survey; and IMF staff calculations and Cazzinga et al(2024) showed the life-cycle profile of employment shares by education level for Brazil and the United Kingdom 
  6. Philippe Aghion, Céline Antonin, Simon Bunel (2019). Artificial Intelligence, Growth and Employment: The Role of Policy. Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, 2019, 510-511-512, pp.150 - 164. (https://sciencespo.hal.science/view/index/identifiant/hal-03403370)
  7. Task identified as Bottlenecks to automation were partially informed from research from Automation, Skills, Use and Training  OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Papers, CD Howe, 
  8. Cazzaniga and others. 2024. “Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work.” IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN2024/001, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
  9. THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON PRODUCTIVITY, DISTRIBUTION AND GROWTH © OECD 2024
  10. Martin Neil Baily, Erik Brynjolfsson, and Anton Korinek (2023) “Machines of mind: The case for an AI-powered productivity boom, Brookings
  11. Cazzaniga and others. 2024. “Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work.” IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN2024/001, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
  12. Andre, C. and P. Gal (2024), “Reviving productivity growth: A review of policies”, OECD Economics Department Policy Paper, forthcoming. Research quoted in the work of Filippucci et al. (2024) 
  13. Artificial Intelligence Commission of France, 2024
  14. Deloitte (2023) , Impact and Opportunities: Canada’s AI ecosystem. Report produced by Deliotte on behalf of CIFAR, Amii, Mila and the Vector Institue 
  15. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/news/2024/04/remarks-by-the-deputy-prime-minister-on-securing-canadas-ai-advantage.html 
  16. Torys https://www.torys.com/en/about-us/news-and-media/2023/12/ai-regulation-in-canada
  17. IBM Global Adoption Index November 2023
  18. Generative AI: A Turning Point for Labor’s Share? Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Research Department (2024) Lukasz A. Drozd and Marina M. Tavares
     

Disclaimer